refactor: rebuild template — Tailwind v4, Docker self-hosting, passkey auth

Toolchain fixes (all previously broken):
- npm run lint: next lint was removed in Next 16 -> eslint with flat config
- .eslintrc.json was ignored by ESLint 9 -> eslint.config.mjs
- npm test / test:e2e exited 1 with no tests -> passWithNoTests
- Vitest scanned tests/ and would have run Playwright specs -> scoped to src/
- Playwright targeted Mobile Safari while docs installed only chromium
- reuseExistingServer silently tested a foreign server on :3000 -> E2E_PORT
- 11 high-severity vulns -> npm audit fix
- deny rule Read(**/.env*) also blocked .env.example -> precise patterns

Stack changes:
- Tailwind v3 -> v4 (CSS-first, no tailwind.config.ts, tw-animate-css)
- shadcn regenerated for v4; 33 components -> 6 core, bundled radix-ui
- Supabase removed entirely; data layer is now chosen per project
- Vercel removed; Docker Compose self-hosting with scripts/update.sh
- Better Auth + passkey plugin as the binding auth standard
- ThemeProvider and Sonner mounted; dark mode and toasts now actually work

Workflow system:
- Sub-agents wired: /frontend, /backend, /qa delegate to .claude/agents
- Checklists folded into their SKILL.md; one file per skill
- Rules rewritten: DB-agnostic backend, passkey security, v4 frontend
- Spec language settled as German, skill instructions English
This commit is contained in:
Florian Wilde
2026-08-09 00:48:50 +02:00
parent a8b196e92b
commit b0c4e9e9b9
101 changed files with 3651 additions and 7695 deletions
+54 -65
View File
@@ -1,95 +1,84 @@
---
name: frontend
description: Build UI components with React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS, and shadcn/ui. Use after architecture is designed.
argument-hint: "feature-spec-path"
description: Build UI components with React, Next.js, Tailwind v4 and shadcn/ui. Use after architecture is designed.
argument-hint: "PROJ-X or feature-spec-path"
user-invocable: true
---
# Frontend Developer
# Frontend
## Role
You are an experienced Frontend Developer. You read feature specs + tech design and implement the UI using React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS, and shadcn/ui.
You own the UI phase for one feature. You do the interview and the review with the
user; the **Frontend Developer** sub-agent does the implementation.
## Before Starting
1. Read `features/INDEX.md` for project context
2. Read the feature spec referenced by the user (including Tech Design section)
3. Check installed shadcn/ui components: `ls src/components/ui/`
4. Check existing custom components: `ls src/components/*.tsx 2>/dev/null`
5. Check existing hooks: `ls src/hooks/ 2>/dev/null`
6. Check existing pages: `ls src/app/`
## 1. Load context
## Workflow
1. Read `features/INDEX.md`
2. Read the feature spec, including its Tech Design section
3. `ls src/components/ui/` — installed shadcn components
4. `git ls-files src/components/` — existing custom components
### 1. Read Feature Spec + Design
- Understand the component architecture from Solution Architect
- Identify which shadcn/ui components to use
- Identify what needs to be built custom
**If the spec has no Tech Design section:**
> "Für PROJ-X gibt es noch kein technisches Design. Führe zuerst `/architecture` aus —
> ohne Komponentenstruktur baue ich sonst am Entwurf vorbei."
→ Stop.
### 2. Clarify Design Requirements
First check for a project design system: `cat docs/design-system.md 2>/dev/null`
## 2. Clarify design
If `docs/design-system.md` exists → read it and apply its colors, typography, and component guidelines throughout. Do not ask the user about design choices already covered there.
Check for a design system: `cat docs/design-system.md 2>/dev/null`
If it does not exist, check for other design files: `ls -la design/ mockups/ assets/ 2>/dev/null`
If it exists, follow it and do not ask about anything it already answers.
Otherwise check `ls design/ mockups/ 2>/dev/null`, and if nothing exists, ask the
user — one question at a time, each with a recommendation:
If no design specs exist at all, ask the user:
- Visual style preference (modern/minimal, corporate, playful, dark mode)
- Reference designs or inspiration URLs
- Brand colors (hex codes or use Tailwind defaults)
- Layout preference (sidebar, top-nav, centered)
- Visual style (modern/minimal, corporate, playful)
- Brand colors, or Tailwind/shadcn defaults
- Layout (sidebar, top-nav, centered)
- Interactions beyond the basics (drag & drop, animations)
### 3. Clarify Technical Questions
- Mobile-first or desktop-first?
- Any specific interactions needed (hover effects, animations, drag & drop)?
- Accessibility requirements beyond defaults (WCAG 2.1 AA)?
## 3. Set status
### 4. Implement Components
- Create components in `/src/components/`
- ALWAYS use shadcn/ui for standard UI elements (check `src/components/ui/` first!)
- If a shadcn component is missing, install it: `npx shadcn@latest add <name> --yes`
- Only create custom components as compositions of shadcn primitives
- Use Tailwind CSS for all styling
Update `features/INDEX.md` and the spec header to **In Progress**. Verify by
re-reading.
### 5. Integrate into Pages
- Add components to pages in `/src/app/`
- Set up routing if needed
- Connect to backend APIs or localStorage as specified in tech design
## 4. Delegate implementation
### 6. User Review
- Tell the user to test in browser (localhost:3000)
- Ask: "Does the UI look right? Any changes needed?"
- Iterate based on feedback
Invoke the **Frontend Developer** sub-agent with:
- the spec path
- the design decisions from step 2
- the component list from the Tech Design
- the shadcn components already installed
## Context Recovery
If your context was compacted mid-task:
1. Re-read the feature spec you're implementing
2. Re-read `features/INDEX.md` for current status
3. Run `git diff` to see what you've already changed
4. Run `git ls-files src/components/ | head -20` to see current component state
5. Continue from where you left off - don't restart or duplicate work
Wait for its report. Do not implement in parallel yourself.
## After Completion: Backend & QA Handoff
## 5. Review with the user
Check the feature spec - does this feature need backend?
Present the sub-agent's report, then:
> "Läuft unter http://localhost:3000. Schau es dir an — passt das so?"
**Backend needed if:** Database access, user authentication, server-side logic, API endpoints, multi-user data sync
Iterate on feedback by sending follow-up instructions to the same sub-agent, so it
keeps its context.
**No backend if:** localStorage only, no user accounts, no server communication
## 6. Wrap up
If backend is needed:
> "Frontend is done! This feature needs backend work. Next step: Run `/backend` to build the APIs and database."
Verify before declaring done:
- [ ] `npm run lint`, `npm run typecheck`, `npm run build` pass
- [ ] Every acceptance criterion has a UI counterpart
- [ ] shadcn used everywhere it could be; no hand-written duplicates
- [ ] Loading, error and empty states exist
- [ ] Responsive at 375 / 768 / 1440px
- [ ] Spec updated with implementation notes (written **and** re-read)
- [ ] `features/INDEX.md` status is In Progress
- [ ] User approved
If no backend needed:
> "Frontend is done! Next step: Run `/qa` to test this feature against its acceptance criteria."
## Handoff
## Checklist
See [checklist.md](checklist.md) for the full implementation checklist.
Does the feature need a server side (data storage, auth, APIs, cross-device sync)?
After completion, update tracking files:
- [ ] Feature spec updated with implementation notes
- [ ] `features/INDEX.md` status updated to "In Progress"
- Yes → "Frontend steht. Nächster Schritt: `/backend` für APIs und Datenhaltung."
- No → "Frontend steht. Nächster Schritt: `/qa` zum Testen gegen die Acceptance Criteria."
## Commit
## Git Commit
```
feat(PROJ-X): Implement frontend for [feature name]
```