Template
Toolchain fixes (all previously broken): - npm run lint: next lint was removed in Next 16 -> eslint with flat config - .eslintrc.json was ignored by ESLint 9 -> eslint.config.mjs - npm test / test:e2e exited 1 with no tests -> passWithNoTests - Vitest scanned tests/ and would have run Playwright specs -> scoped to src/ - Playwright targeted Mobile Safari while docs installed only chromium - reuseExistingServer silently tested a foreign server on :3000 -> E2E_PORT - 11 high-severity vulns -> npm audit fix - deny rule Read(**/.env*) also blocked .env.example -> precise patterns Stack changes: - Tailwind v3 -> v4 (CSS-first, no tailwind.config.ts, tw-animate-css) - shadcn regenerated for v4; 33 components -> 6 core, bundled radix-ui - Supabase removed entirely; data layer is now chosen per project - Vercel removed; Docker Compose self-hosting with scripts/update.sh - Better Auth + passkey plugin as the binding auth standard - ThemeProvider and Sonner mounted; dark mode and toasts now actually work Workflow system: - Sub-agents wired: /frontend, /backend, /qa delegate to .claude/agents - Checklists folded into their SKILL.md; one file per skill - Rules rewritten: DB-agnostic backend, passkey security, v4 frontend - Spec language settled as German, skill instructions English
809 B
809 B
Product Requirements Document
Vision
Was wird gebaut und warum? Zwei bis drei Sätze.
Zielgruppe
Wer nutzt das Produkt? Welchen konkreten Schmerz hat diese Gruppe heute?
Roadmap
| Priorität | Feature | Status |
|---|---|---|
| P0 (MVP) | Feature 1 | Roadmap |
| P0 (MVP) | Feature 2 | Roadmap |
| P1 | Feature 3 | Roadmap |
| P2 | Feature 4 | Roadmap |
Erfolgsmetriken
Woran wird gemessen, ob das Produkt funktioniert?
Rahmenbedingungen
Zeit, Budget, Teamgröße, technische Grenzen. Auch: Braucht das Projekt dauerhafte Datenspeicherung? Braucht es Nutzerkonten?
Nicht-Ziele
Was in dieser Version bewusst nicht gebaut wird.
Dieses Dokument füllt /init im Interview aus. Danach entstehen mit /write-spec
die einzelnen Feature-Specs.