Template
Toolchain fixes (all previously broken): - npm run lint: next lint was removed in Next 16 -> eslint with flat config - .eslintrc.json was ignored by ESLint 9 -> eslint.config.mjs - npm test / test:e2e exited 1 with no tests -> passWithNoTests - Vitest scanned tests/ and would have run Playwright specs -> scoped to src/ - Playwright targeted Mobile Safari while docs installed only chromium - reuseExistingServer silently tested a foreign server on :3000 -> E2E_PORT - 11 high-severity vulns -> npm audit fix - deny rule Read(**/.env*) also blocked .env.example -> precise patterns Stack changes: - Tailwind v3 -> v4 (CSS-first, no tailwind.config.ts, tw-animate-css) - shadcn regenerated for v4; 33 components -> 6 core, bundled radix-ui - Supabase removed entirely; data layer is now chosen per project - Vercel removed; Docker Compose self-hosting with scripts/update.sh - Better Auth + passkey plugin as the binding auth standard - ThemeProvider and Sonner mounted; dark mode and toasts now actually work Workflow system: - Sub-agents wired: /frontend, /backend, /qa delegate to .claude/agents - Checklists folded into their SKILL.md; one file per skill - Rules rewritten: DB-agnostic backend, passkey security, v4 frontend - Spec language settled as German, skill instructions English
85 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
85 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: frontend
|
|
description: Build UI components with React, Next.js, Tailwind v4 and shadcn/ui. Use after architecture is designed.
|
|
argument-hint: "PROJ-X or feature-spec-path"
|
|
user-invocable: true
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Frontend
|
|
|
|
You own the UI phase for one feature. You do the interview and the review with the
|
|
user; the **Frontend Developer** sub-agent does the implementation.
|
|
|
|
## 1. Load context
|
|
|
|
1. Read `features/INDEX.md`
|
|
2. Read the feature spec, including its Tech Design section
|
|
3. `ls src/components/ui/` — installed shadcn components
|
|
4. `git ls-files src/components/` — existing custom components
|
|
|
|
**If the spec has no Tech Design section:**
|
|
> "Für PROJ-X gibt es noch kein technisches Design. Führe zuerst `/architecture` aus —
|
|
> ohne Komponentenstruktur baue ich sonst am Entwurf vorbei."
|
|
→ Stop.
|
|
|
|
## 2. Clarify design
|
|
|
|
Check for a design system: `cat docs/design-system.md 2>/dev/null`
|
|
|
|
If it exists, follow it and do not ask about anything it already answers.
|
|
Otherwise check `ls design/ mockups/ 2>/dev/null`, and if nothing exists, ask the
|
|
user — one question at a time, each with a recommendation:
|
|
|
|
- Visual style (modern/minimal, corporate, playful)
|
|
- Brand colors, or Tailwind/shadcn defaults
|
|
- Layout (sidebar, top-nav, centered)
|
|
- Interactions beyond the basics (drag & drop, animations)
|
|
|
|
## 3. Set status
|
|
|
|
Update `features/INDEX.md` and the spec header to **In Progress**. Verify by
|
|
re-reading.
|
|
|
|
## 4. Delegate implementation
|
|
|
|
Invoke the **Frontend Developer** sub-agent with:
|
|
- the spec path
|
|
- the design decisions from step 2
|
|
- the component list from the Tech Design
|
|
- the shadcn components already installed
|
|
|
|
Wait for its report. Do not implement in parallel yourself.
|
|
|
|
## 5. Review with the user
|
|
|
|
Present the sub-agent's report, then:
|
|
> "Läuft unter http://localhost:3000. Schau es dir an — passt das so?"
|
|
|
|
Iterate on feedback by sending follow-up instructions to the same sub-agent, so it
|
|
keeps its context.
|
|
|
|
## 6. Wrap up
|
|
|
|
Verify before declaring done:
|
|
- [ ] `npm run lint`, `npm run typecheck`, `npm run build` pass
|
|
- [ ] Every acceptance criterion has a UI counterpart
|
|
- [ ] shadcn used everywhere it could be; no hand-written duplicates
|
|
- [ ] Loading, error and empty states exist
|
|
- [ ] Responsive at 375 / 768 / 1440px
|
|
- [ ] Spec updated with implementation notes (written **and** re-read)
|
|
- [ ] `features/INDEX.md` status is In Progress
|
|
- [ ] User approved
|
|
|
|
## Handoff
|
|
|
|
Does the feature need a server side (data storage, auth, APIs, cross-device sync)?
|
|
|
|
- Yes → "Frontend steht. Nächster Schritt: `/backend` für APIs und Datenhaltung."
|
|
- No → "Frontend steht. Nächster Schritt: `/qa` zum Testen gegen die Acceptance Criteria."
|
|
|
|
## Commit
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
feat(PROJ-X): Implement frontend for [feature name]
|
|
```
|